img
Your Cart
empty-box

Your Cart List Is Empty

Cart is empty. Please go to your home page for listing it.

Jordan Journal of Natural History (JJNH)

The Jordan Journal of Natural History (JJNH) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of research integrity, ethical publishing, and scientific quality. The journal follows internationally accepted principles of publication ethics and is guided by the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are based solely on the scientific merit, originality, quality, and relevance of submitted manuscripts. Editors shall not discriminate on the basis of nationality, gender, institutional affiliation, political beliefs, or personal characteristics.

Peer Review

The JJNH operates a fully human-managed double-blind peer-review system. Manuscripts are evaluated by independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Editorial assessments, peer reviews, and publication decisions are conducted exclusively by editors and reviewers. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools are not used in editorial decision-making or peer review.

Responsibilities of Authors

Authors must ensure that submitted work is original, accurately presented, and not under consideration elsewhere. All authors must have made substantial contributions to the manuscript and approve its submission. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of data, proper citation of sources, disclosure of conflicts of interest, and compliance with applicable legal and ethical requirements.

Research Ethics

Research involving animals, protected species, biological collections, protected areas, or field studies must comply with relevant laws, regulations, permit requirements, and accepted ethical standards. Authors may be required to provide evidence of permits, approvals, or ethical clearances where applicable.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers shall treat manuscripts as confidential documents and provide objective, constructive, directive, and timely evaluations. Reviewers must declare any conflicts of interest and decline review where impartial assessment cannot be ensured.

Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for maintaining confidentiality, ensuring a fair and unbiased review process, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing allegations of misconduct. Editors may seek additional expert advice when ethical concerns arise.

Publication Malpractice

The journal considers the following practices unacceptable:

Plagiarism and self-plagiarism.

Data fabrication or falsification.

Duplicate or redundant publication.

Inappropriate authorship attribution.

Citation manipulation.

Undisclosed conflicts of interest.

Peer-review manipulation.

Image or data manipulation that misrepresents results.

Manuscripts found to involve misconduct may be rejected, corrected, retracted, or referred to the relevant institutions as appropriate.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any financial, professional, institutional, or personal relationships that could influence the evaluation, interpretation, or publication of a manuscript.

Corrections and Retractions

Where significant errors, ethical concerns, or misconduct are identified, JJNH may publish corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern in order to maintain the integrity of the scientific record.

Complaints and Appeals

Authors may appeal editorial decisions or raise concerns regarding the editorial process by contacting the Editor-in-Chief. All complaints and appeals will be handled fairly, confidentially, and in accordance with established ethical principles.

Data Integrity

Authors should retain original data and provide access to supporting information when reasonably requested by the editors. The journal encourages transparency and reproducibility of research findings.

Ethical Oversight

The JJNH reserves the right to investigate allegations of publication misconduct before or after publication and to take appropriate action to protect the integrity of the scholarly record.

Process for Identification of and Dealing with Allegations of Research Misconduct

The Journal is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all reasonable measures to prevent the publication of articles involving research misconduct. The Journal does not encourage, support, or knowingly permit any form of misconduct.

The JJNH hold no responsibility for plagiarism. If a published paper is found later to be extensively plagiarized and is found to be a duplicate or redundant publication, a note of retraction will be published, and copies of the correspondence will be sent to the authors’ head of institute.

When allegations or suspicions of research misconduct arise, whether before or after publication, the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board will investigate the matter in accordance with the guidelines and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

The investigation process may include:

Preliminary assessment of the allegation by the editorial office;

Communication with the corresponding author and, where appropriate, all co-authors;

Requesting original data, supporting documentation, or explanations from the authors;

Consultation with reviewers, editorial board members, or relevant experts when necessary;

Referral of serious cases to the authors' affiliated institutions or funding bodies.

Depending on the outcome of the investigation, the Journal may take appropriate actions, including manuscript rejection, publication of corrections, expressions of concern, retractions, or notification of relevant institutions.

The Journal follows COPE Core Practices and COPE flowcharts in handling all allegations of research misconduct to ensure a fair, transparent, and ethical resolution process.