Cart is empty. Please go to your home page for listing it.
Editorial decisions are based solely on the scientific merit, originality, quality, and relevance of submitted manuscripts. Editors shall not discriminate on the basis of nationality, gender, institutional affiliation, political beliefs, or personal characteristics.
The JJNH operates a fully human-managed double-blind peer-review system. Manuscripts are evaluated by independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Editorial assessments, peer reviews, and publication decisions are conducted exclusively by editors and reviewers. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools are not used in editorial decision-making or peer review.
Authors must ensure that submitted work is original, accurately presented, and not under consideration elsewhere. All authors must have made substantial contributions to the manuscript and approve its submission. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of data, proper citation of sources, disclosure of conflicts of interest, and compliance with applicable legal and ethical requirements.
Research involving animals, protected species, biological collections, protected areas, or field studies must comply with relevant laws, regulations, permit requirements, and accepted ethical standards. Authors may be required to provide evidence of permits, approvals, or ethical clearances where applicable.
Reviewers shall treat manuscripts as confidential documents and provide objective, constructive, directive, and timely evaluations. Reviewers must declare any conflicts of interest and decline review where impartial assessment cannot be ensured.
Editors are responsible for maintaining confidentiality, ensuring a fair and unbiased review process, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing allegations of misconduct. Editors may seek additional expert advice when ethical concerns arise.
The journal considers the following practices unacceptable:
Plagiarism and self-plagiarism.
Data fabrication or falsification.
Duplicate or redundant publication.
Inappropriate authorship attribution.
Citation manipulation.
Undisclosed conflicts of interest.
Peer-review manipulation.
Image or data manipulation that misrepresents results.
Manuscripts found to involve misconduct may be rejected, corrected, retracted, or referred to the relevant institutions as appropriate.
Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any financial, professional, institutional, or personal relationships that could influence the evaluation, interpretation, or publication of a manuscript.
Where significant errors, ethical concerns, or misconduct are identified, JJNH may publish corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern in order to maintain the integrity of the scientific record.
Authors may appeal editorial decisions or raise concerns regarding the editorial process by contacting the Editor-in-Chief. All complaints and appeals will be handled fairly, confidentially, and in accordance with established ethical principles.
Authors should retain original data and provide access to supporting information when reasonably requested by the editors. The journal encourages transparency and reproducibility of research findings.
The JJNH reserves the right to investigate allegations of publication misconduct before or after publication and to take appropriate action to protect the integrity of the scholarly record.